| Andy Roberts' |
|
coursework |
course: BA ( Hons) Learning, Technology
and Research (Information Communication Technology)
This Flash Movie is not
interactive. Please relax, then press 'play' and sit back and observe for approximately
5 minutes.
if you miss part of the movie you just have to watch it all over again from
the beginning!
"The jelly ART is my form of relaxation. I add a bit most days" - Helena Maclennan
"Being involved with jelly art gave me the courage to present my report
2 as a powerpoint"
- Jane Austin, making a better jellyOS discussion - 1.10.2003
"Even when I thought I was just playing with jelly art I was learning" -" Learning through play isn't just for key stage 1" Linda Hartley
"Do you think we could do this for our degree?" Jan Nancolas
"the jelly art club method and structure provided the model for societies and clubs in the jelly environment" E Mann.
![]() |
|
example of early promotion of the club in the main registered
users page
|
| Andy Roberts' |
|
coursework |
course: BA ( Hons) Learning, Technology
and Research (Information Communication Technology)
1) introduction |
2) general online experience |
3) a theory |
4) online learning tools |
5) survey of online communities |
6) literature review |
7) self interview |
Appendix & site map |
1) introduction |
|
This report follows on from report1
overlapping the period of term1 and revisiting some of the same activities,
but focussing more on the tools and use of online community. Two main
elements are the Flash animation at the top of the report, which takes
the viewer through my early experiences of jellyOS, and the activity
I planned earlier which involved sending out a questionnaire to volunteers
from a variety of different types of online community with which I happen
to be familiar. |
3) a theory |
|
My theory is that online communities generally move towards arranging for a subset of members to meet up 'in real life' ( IRL) and that this then marks a necessary stage of development which impacts on and reinforces the online community itself. Early promotional literature for Ultraversity suggested that students would probably never meet their tutors or fellow students,
But my understand of group dynamics within online communities led
me to believe that face-to-face meetings would indeed be planned . It was not myself but Linda Hartley who asked in the jellyART club "how about a social event?". After a while I created a new discussion for discussing social events and half a dozen people contributed positively. That's a lot for jelly. The London discussion, initiated by Chloe Hodder has also seen a number of students spontaneously organising to meet up at the BETT show - ( one MSNmessenger contact of mine is considering coming from Manchester) and I have seen evidence of Essex based students arranging to meet each other as well. I am sure there are other examples in those parts of jellyOS I never reach. It's all enough to convince me that face to face meetings emerging from online contact between people with the one thing in common that brought them to that particular online community, are a certainty, and that the communities benefit to an extent that organisers ( if any ) or conscious guides should take into account, encourage and probably make provision for. |
4) account of online learning tools |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
I first heard about the Ultraversity online degree course in an email from my son Frankie. I registered an interest and cleared up a few questions via email also, and then received an application form in the post (snail mail). Ultraversity Website
Stickies
Personal Profiling Tool
|
![]() |
| A screenshot of Forté Agent, my email and newsgroup reading software. |
One of the earliest emails from my assigned Learning facilitator to her small group of students was sent out using a CC ( Carbon Copy ) list of email addresses. This meant that I could respond by clicking "reply to all" and all the recipients of the group email would get my message too. In my message I explained how to do this so that other students could reply back to the group. This is the simplest form of many-to-many
communication, and it resulted in several students introducing themselves and saying a bit about their work and aspirations for the course.
The disadvantage of using a CClist is the feeling that you may be annoying some people by sending them unsolicited mail, since many-to-many communication can sometimes escalate into extended multiple messages from only a few participants ricocheting back and fore several times a day. Once you are included in a chain of CC's like this it can be very difficult to get off it again, since the list only exists as document headers in the emails inside many people's inboxes.
The next step is to provide a way in which people can choose to subscribe or unsubscribe as they wish. This liberates the writer from feeling they are impinging on the others, and makes it possible for new people to join in. So I transferred the CClist into an email group using the facilities provided by yahoogroups.com. People who had responded to the CC list I added directly in and the remainder were invited to subscribe themselves.
There were 4 messages in August, 8 in September, 21 in October and 203 in November, including many saying how much they had appreciated getting messages from fellow students while working away at the reports sometimes late at night. The group has a sense of identity already, and is used for sharing information encouragement and compassion as well as a technical and course help line.
screenshot from 7/12/2003Problems of too much traffic for some people to cope with are beginning to emerge, and the group is trying to solve this through requesting people to 'tag' messages with "INFO", "CHAT" "HELP" in the subject. My prediction based on experience, is that this will only partially work, as some people will tend to respond to each others' posts in a new vein without changing the subject header. There could also be technical problems with some mailservers rejecting certain emails that have gone through yahoo, resulting in 'bounces' and missed or late messages.
I have set myself the target of finding out about somewhere which will host a major-domo listserver for me so that if things deteriorate I won't have to rely on yahoogroups for these services.
http://www.ultrastudents.co.uk
The Independent Learning Plan tool is connected to the Ultraversity Online database for profiling and tracking Ultraversity students. A webpage with text input boxes allows the student to edit a template of suggested learning activities to produce a custom plan. I felt unconfident about what I was supposed to be doing here, especially since there were several misleading clues left lying about.

In my report 1 I wrote : "I think the method of using an Individual Learning Plan is an excellent one, and it suits me particularly well since I like to have tasks clearly laid out for me to do, and know how I am going to be able to do them. In future I would take more time to carefully consider the ILP and make sure that I understand it fully and that it will meet the required objectives before starting the activities."
An online weblog tool has been used for my Learning Journal, and I review its use in
Activity 4
Plan and develop a learning journal so that I can write down or record
my thoughts from each learning activity.findings
Findings are included as a part of this assessed report here in activity 4 ( 800 words) leading to the journal itself at
Since JellyOS, the community software used by ultraversity has already been discussed far too much on jellyOS itself and elsewhere, and is the subject of my Flash Movie introduction, I shall restrict myself in this section to including work already done.
My 'home' page on jellyOS as at 28/10/03My initial impressions of jellyOS from my blog -
and revisited later
|
Friday, November 28, 2003
On JellyOS after 2 months Strengths and Weaknesses This post in response to the discussion started by Jolyon Miller - Making a better JellyOS. The strength of jellyOS lies in the ability for
almost anybody to create a simple homepage, upload photos, make
a guestbook and link to others. The weakness is in the functionality
of discussions - having to scroll slowly through lots of old
messages only to find there a re no new ones, no ability to
sort for most recent, by author, or anything like that. |
For a description of my participation in some community conversations and screenshots as evidence please visit activity 1.4
What does an expert say about technology for communities of practice ?
Etienne Wenger seems to be held in some respect by the academics and writes..
Furthermore, a technological platform for communities of practice should ideally be
*Easy to learn and use because communities of practice are usually not people's main job.
*Easily integrated with other software that members of the community are using for their regular work so that participation in the community requires as few steps as possible
*Not too expensive. If it requires a lot of investment up front, potentially useful communities will not be able to take advantage of the platform. Indeed, many communities start with only a partial understanding of the value they will provide eventually. (Wenger 2001, p8)
I feel this quote fully supports my above "problems of the fundamental" criticism of jellyOS
I decided to use HTML as the main vehicle for publishing my ultraversity work and Dreanweaver as the package for managing the uploading of files and maintenance of the growing website.
Blog entry Sunday, October 26, 2003
|
excerpt from: Sunday, October 26, 2003 getting stuck in, and choosing HTML for presenting coursework |
|
I've now got rather a lot of gathered material for activity one, but that's OK because it is a substantial activity compared to some of the later ones. I looked at the work in progress 'simpletext' document I'd brought home on my pen drive and found it hard to work with in a Windows environment, and appleworks documents are unreadable so what format should I use to write up my coursework? I had previously discounted the idea of presenting it as a website, for two reasons - it seems a bit OTT, takes a bit longer to load up a big package like dreamweaver than a text editor, and I don't feel I want to be writing for a world-wide audience "hullo this is me, here's my picture, here's my cat " sort of thing. But when it comes down to it, HTML is the best tool I have
for the job. It is afterall, a |
Screenshot of Dreamweaver about to upload this very page to the live website

MSN messenger is one of a number of online synchronous realtime chat programs, probably the most popular right now, which enable instant conversations between two or more contacts, and the exchange of files. What does it look like? See below


Early on in the CClist, yahoogroup days some people gave out their MSN messenger contact names and I added them to my list. I don't get around to launching MSN messenger all that often and when I do there is quite often nobody else available to discuss with. It can be a very flexible and useful tool for holding discussions, helping people and sharing the internet exploring experience, through the passing of URLs. At first, people feel they have to make conversation all the time, a bit like being on the phone, but experienced users understand that other people may be busy doing different things on their computer at the same time and will leave conversations running but silent for extended periods, then popping the occasional question or comment as the need arises. Students with a report to write for a deadline will probably want to switch it off altogether to avoid being distracted by pleasant but unproductive chit chat.
To contact me with MSN Messenger please add magpiecrow@hotmail.com to your contact list
A tool is just a tool. What matters is that it does the job intended efficiently, safely and enjoyably. Some tools can be used for more than one purpose and some purposes can be filled by more than one type of tool. People tend to like the one they first learned to use the best, unless it's really bad. Remember the old saying "A bad workman blames his tools"? That's dangerously misleading rubbish. Any workman will tell you that you can't do a good job with bad tools, in fact in software engineering it's usually smarter to spend a lengthy period at the beginning of a job creating the tools for it before getting on with the job itself. And we don't waste time creating new parts for tools when there are good ones lying around which can be freely employed. The modern object-orientated approach is wholly based on the idea that flexible and reusable modules are the key, and need to be created so that specific solutions can be built out of pre-existing parts wherever possible.
5) investigation ( survey) |
methodI sent out email questionnaires to volunteers from several groups where I am an occasional participant, saved the results. findingssee learning activity 5Analysis of the survey data will continue after the deadline for this report but here are some early impressions
For the purposes of this report and investigating my theory, let's look at the minority, people who haven't experienced face-to-face meetings yet. That's 10/39 , slightly over 25% question 6. Have you ever met people from your community, do you intend to? 1) No, Maybe - ( membership 18 months) Apart from one who doesn't see it as a 'community', they experience the online group as a place where real life meetings may originate, but either haven't done so or don't wish to. reflectionI learned a lot through this activity already, mainly about research, about questionnaires, questions, different email formats, collating results and more. I'd never done anything like it before and it was interesting devising the method. Another time I would think even more carefully about the questions, and pilot the questionnaire with a small group of people in order to test the way other people understand my questions. Some of the replies are really quite insightful and will provide good material for thought and further investigation long after this report is handed in. |
6) literature review |
|||
methodI tried doing Google searches to find out what the available literature had to say about 'real life' meetings of online community members. I looked at items from the course supplied Guidance for literature on Online Learning , with reference to my theory. findingsTo my surprise I found very little that was immediately forthcoming from either source. One paper turned up in my searches which contained a reference to another, and a hypothesis similar to my own.
In the Ultralab papers, reports of successful online communities - Talking Heads ( Ramondt L,2002) and Bursers Count, (Gee, A 2002) I found no mention of whether or not the most active participants arranged real life meetings. My theory is that they most probably did, but that the significance of these self-organisation events was either overlooked or brushed aside for some reason. It should be possible for me to make contact through ultraversity with some of the facilitators who worked on those projects and ask them. The Full Circle Website, http://www.fullcirc.com/index.htm provides professional advice to builders of online communities and in one section 'Getting and Retaining Members' Heather Duggan describes The stages of membership -
She then goes on to offer various tips for facilitating the various stages but nowhere mentions the possibility of the regulars being consolidated through real life meetings. Howard Rheingold, on the other hand, has had a similar experience myself only more so. In his speech to BBC ONLINE , section "How I Fell Into Cyberspace and What I Found There" he recounts -
|
References |
|
| Duggan H (1999-2003) |
Getting and Retaining Members |
| Warisse Turner, Grube and Meyers, J., J.A. & J (2001) | Developing an optimal match within Online communities: An exploration of CMC Support communities and Traditional Support. pp. 231-251 in Journal of Communication June 2001 viewed electronically at http://cct.georgetown.edu/docs/JOC.pdf on 30/11/03 |
| Rheingold, H |
Community Development In The Cybersociety of the Future viewed online at http://www.partnerships.org.uk/bol/howard.htm |
| Wenger E, (2001) |
Supporting communities of practice - a survey of community-oriented technologies. viewed electronically (shareware) at http://www.ewenger.com/tech/
on 4/12/2003 |