<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: London Overground Dalston to New Cross</title>
	<atom:link href="http://distributedresearch.net/blog/2010/05/04/london-overground-dalston-to-new-cross/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://distributedresearch.net/blog/2010/05/04/london-overground-dalston-to-new-cross</link>
	<description>Distributed Action Research blog by Andy Roberts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 09:56:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isha</title>
		<link>http://distributedresearch.net/blog/2010/05/04/london-overground-dalston-to-new-cross#comment-106586</link>
		<dc:creator>Isha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 13:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://distributedresearch.net/blog/?p=2118#comment-106586</guid>
		<description>Looking at the timetable for Dalston Junction to West Croydon, it appears we will have to change trains somewhere between Surrey Quays and Norwood.  How stupid is that?

www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/dalston-junction-to-west-croydon.pdf

As an added annoyance, there are no more trains on the Richmond&gt;Stratford line than they were before

www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/richmond-clapham-junction-to-stratford.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the timetable for Dalston Junction to West Croydon, it appears we will have to change trains somewhere between Surrey Quays and Norwood.  How stupid is that?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/dalston-junction-to-west-croydon.pdf">http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/dalston-junction-to-west-croydon.pdf</a></p>
<p>As an added annoyance, there are no more trains on the Richmond&gt;Stratford line than they were before</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/richmond-clapham-junction-to-stratford.pdf">http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/richmond-clapham-junction-to-stratford.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frankie Roberto</title>
		<link>http://distributedresearch.net/blog/2010/05/04/london-overground-dalston-to-new-cross#comment-104962</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankie Roberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 12:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://distributedresearch.net/blog/?p=2118#comment-104962</guid>
		<description>I suspect that another reason for the sideways seating is to make them feel more &#039;tube&#039; like (new circle and district line trains have abandoned the compartment-style seating too).

Whilst the Overground may technically be a train, it&#039;s being designed as more of a metro-style turn-up-and-go service, with the timetable becoming irrelevant as the frequencies go up.

Makes sense from the perspective of best serving the most amount of people (peak commuters), but does have the side effect of making it slightly less comfortable for longer-distance travellers. At least they&#039;re air-conditioned though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that another reason for the sideways seating is to make them feel more &#8216;tube&#8217; like (new circle and district line trains have abandoned the compartment-style seating too).</p>
<p>Whilst the Overground may technically be a train, it&#8217;s being designed as more of a metro-style turn-up-and-go service, with the timetable becoming irrelevant as the frequencies go up.</p>
<p>Makes sense from the perspective of best serving the most amount of people (peak commuters), but does have the side effect of making it slightly less comfortable for longer-distance travellers. At least they&#8217;re air-conditioned though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

